Dissociative Identity
Disorder
&
The Question of
Authenticity
Many
of us find ourselves contemplating the question of “who am I” at some point or
another; perhaps we are pursuant of a spiritual connection to our place in the
universe or may be hoping to connect with ourselves veritably. Evaluating the
supposition of authenticity highlights the fact that fidelity to self is
layered and complex. The
foundation is characterized by a knowing; awareness of internal strata and
facets of one’s constitution. Secondary
to knowing is acceptance of one’s characteristics; only with knowledge and
acceptance of who we are can we begin to navigate our relationship to the world
around us. Presenting ourselves genuinely without fear or regret is risky and
requires significant ego strength; the venture of rejection of true self is
more painful than that of a disingenuous self. Relating to others in a real way while being accepted
simultaneously is a challenge for all of us; individuals with Dissociative
Identity Disorder (DID) are faced with a normal question that is complicated by
multiplicity (and it’s functions).
The
basal layer of authenticity poses a problem to dissociative individuals; the
function of fragmenting can be to hide selves from the self. Presupposing this is a protective
process, how does one connect to who they are if overwhelming information is
held in the answer to the question? Parts or “alters” are often hidden from
view or are “behind the curtain” of consciousness in order to protect the rest
of the system. Self-awareness can
seem commensurate to emotional gambling.
The
second layer of authenticity requires acceptance. Assuming trauma is the
etiological base behind DID, acknowledgement of some alters can feel parallel
to an acceptance of unacceptable events.
Protective alters who hold anger, self-injure, engage in addictive, or
violent behavior are often completely rejected by the rest of the internal
system. Child alters (who often
hold the traumatic memories) are sometimes viewed by the rest of the system as
pathetic, shameful and weak.
Managerial alters do find external belonging, but become fatigued from
their overwhelming task of hiding and pushing for success. Recognition of a
fragmented identity may equate to acceptance of the past, acceptance of a
controversial diagnosis, and acceptance of an experience that many people will
find challenging to connect to.
A
common theme that arises in working with DID reflects this quandary; how can I
be myself if my self changes?. Essentially this is a logistical question; how
does one establish an authentic connection to the outside world when it feels
like one’s demographics are in flux? Age, gender, and race are significant
determinants of who we relate with and how relationships develop. Small children like to play in very
different ways than teens or adults do; men develop different relationships
with women than they do with men and adolescents think adults are ridiculous.
What if you are male sometimes, a five year-old at other times, or an adolescent
girl at others? This is an
experiential truth for those with DID and it is very unclear as to how to be
real and accepted under the umbrella of fragmentation.
When
asked the question of how to relate to others in a way that feels real, my
response is likely fairly inadequate.
I can only acknowledge the reality that DID is difficult even for some
mental health professionals to accept (although research is making this more
and more challenging); friends, family members, co-workers, and strangers are
even less prepared to navigate such relationships. There is truth in this experience and I have not discovered
the right answer to living authentically in a world that is accustomed to and
expects continuity. It could
be argued that we all are multi-faceted and are accustomed to disguising our
vulnerability or less acceptable components of personality. Authenticity is a
collective challenge, although it is a far more complex aspiration for those
whose experience of who they are is relatively fluid. Someone who lives with alters may say that in order to be
genuine, they may require acknowledgement of all parts of self, to accept them,
and to interact with the world from varying perspectives.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hello, While I welcome your comments, in order to maintain client privacy, I ask that all comments be anonymous. Thank you.